Modern Pathos: Personal Relationships & Economic Social Justice

So how many significant others do you go through like a pair of jeans? I'm just wondering before I (a) make-out with you and (b) have sex with you.

Wait, each past relationship "had a voice"? Interesting. What did you learn from each? Oh, you "grew" as a person and "learned" what you "wanted." What is it that you learned and wanted?

*crickets*

[mouths off some generic, cliche standard devoid of anything transcendent]

I see.

So I head you traveled to India and Ghana and Mexico. How was that? Oh, you learned a lot about yourself and now consider yourself a "global citizen." What did you learn about yourself? Ah, we're all the same and now you're a human rights advocate teaming up with Emma Watson and Angelina Jolie to save women from poverty in Africa. Well, I'm gonna go down to my city's soup kitchen and volunteer while I mentor a young black teenager in the inner city. I'm thinking of donating at least five percent of my income to the charity of my choice even though I make less than 40K a year.

IMDb forums is the gift that keep on giving.

 Take a look here.

According to some IMDb posters  Selma isn't registering well, audience rating wise, because of racism and a fictitious thing called a "liberal agenda." Here's what they had to say:

The average IMDb is a middle-class white fanboy who doesn't care about social issues and resents any film that steals the thunder from the latest Nolan geekfest, hence their hatred towards Selma. Many of them are also right-of-centre and possibly resent the coverage of the police killings of black men and see Selma as part of some 'liberal agenda' to make them face up to their own privileges.

and (by poster zombieDANCE)

 I laugh because this is probably true.

and (by poster ibaaaaaad)

Racists always troll the black-centric movies without seeing them. Not worth reading into.

I doubt many have heard of this movie, Selma, so allegations for middle white class down voting it is rather ridiculous. 
 
Now it's interesting that both poster zombieDANCE and ibaaaaaad are homosexuals. The zombie guy practically talks in cliches (the guy's is indignant beyond belief) and ibaaaaad is a Muslim, if I'm not mistaken, who isn't as pathetic as zombieDANCE but still has his moments of "well that's just racist!" And he doesn't like the late President Reagan because of how he handled AIDS.Well, if your fellow "love is love"/You-just-help-who-you-fall-in-love-with" peeps wouldn't part take in anal sex and carpet eating (though not a way of getting AIDS, but still) you wouldn't have such a big problem with this horrible disease. Go figure.

"But I lo - "
"It ain't love."

A "tacit" victory. That's an interesting way to put it.

When advocates of same-sex "marriage" say "gay marriage won't affect your marriage" I think they don't acknowledge (or don't realize) the underlying affects of such a belief and "justice."

The fact that they think two people of the same sex shouldn't be a factor when deciding whether to allow them to "wed", that only consent and love ("love is love" card) should matter, it says something about them. It does affect my marriage because it makes it the "archaic"/"narrow minded" view, even though such a view is one of the pillars for western civilization.

What happened today isn't creating anything that actually benefits society besides A) the LGBTYMCA activists and B) the perverts.

The "pairings" aka the homosexual/bi newlyweds, if they even want kids, will always go through a third party to get children. Always. They are sexual incompatible to produce a child together. There is no/zero point to their anal sex and oral sex besides "it feels good, so do it." I'm not sure how anal sex can even remotely feel good.

Here's a story my mother told me. She's a nurse, and one of her co-workers is a homosexual. He's in a relationship with another man who left his wife for him. This man has one child from the previous marriage. The co-worker wants a child because his boyfriend has one. So the co-worker finds a surrogate in India to birth the child. The child dies in labor. The co-worker is devastated. 

Call me heartless, but I feel no sympathy for my mom's co-worker. I do feel sympathy for the child of the boyfriend's and for the surrogate. I also feel for the ex-wife.

And I will not acknowledge any same-sex couple as a couple. Instead I will say "pairing," I won't think they're married even if they have the stamp of state & government approval because such a combination -- same-sex pairings -- defeats logic and purpose, let alone makes the concept of marriage another victim of the perversion of words.

There will be people saying "it doesn't matter what you think." Of course it does. If it didn't then advocates of SS"M" wouldn't be so indignant when people like me express such views. My thoughts are nothing to activist judges, but it sure matters to those who abhor people that share my views. So, the end, it is about acceptance - not just by the government, but by the people who go about their daily lives. It's not about "justice", it's about changing the social thought -- it's practically brainwashing and forcing (through intimidation) a particular (and destructive) belief onto innocent people.

"The eventual green light to same sex marriage will offer an interesting insight into the depraved mind of man."