Should we as a society believe women who say they experienced sexual assault or rape?

 Well should we, just on face value?

My answer is be skeptical. If non-believers say that their non-belief is due to there being no evidence of a divine, then adjust your stance when accusations of sexual assault is brought forth. Say that in each case of an accusation of sexual assault is just that - an accusation  - that has yet to be proven and due to this is devoid of direct evidence. The accused is innocent until proven guilty. 

The same goes for sexism, racism, xenophobia and LGBT+phobia.

Dating preferences in Weimerica.

I've notice something strange when it comes to modern dating and the process of choosing a significant other. Here's what I've observed.

A: Love knows no boundaries* (mainly talking about same-sex coupes and interracial couples).
B: Okay, well what about when a person says he is attracted to a certain ethnicity, say Hispanics over an Asian?
A: That's their preference.
B: Okay, well how about a person who wants to keep their ethnicity/culture intact and only wants to date within their own race?
A: That's approaching racism.
B: Can't it be preference?
A: No, because what I'm talking about is sexual and romantic attraction. A utilitarianism approach is racism. The heart wants what it wants.
B: Okay, what if I say a girl won't date a guy shorter than she is, say all the guys under 5'8 are basically out of luck.
A: Another preference.
B: Wouldn't it be a very shallow preference and borderline petty? If people are encourage to date outside their own ethnicity and culture, when can't women be encouraged to re-analyze their preferences?
A: You're committing sexism. Your utilitarian approach is discrimination.
B: What ethnicity preference and height preference is also discrimination.
A: I wouldn't say that. It's a preference. It's not systemic.
B: Okay, let's move away from dating preferences. How about ACT/SAT scores? You need a certain test score and GPA to not automatically be rejected by certain schools and programs. Why isn't there a whole movement about this? This would be considered systemic discrimination.
A: In some ways that's different as well. But see here - underprivileged kids, those who are/were historically marginalized and oppressed, should not subjected to such measurements. It's unfair.

So I guess not everyone and each scenario is not created equal.

* It has come to a point where the social sciences, and even "science", has encouraged straights to dabble in bisexuality aka sodomy.

They cry. I laugh.

They say "How could you be so cruel?"
I say "Go f_ck yourself with your dildo."

Modern liberals aka "progressives" + left-leaning libertarians cry much more easier than conservatives. Let us look at various remarks where the water works are let out.

"There's so much hate in this world!" *crying*
"I can't believe I belong to the human race!" *crying*
"He's your own flesh and blood! Why would you hurt him!" *crying*
"Hate, bigotry and ignorance are the reasons why America is so backwards!" *crying*

Add in such people tend to take up causes like the awareness wristband craze, take up protesting at least once a year in the name of "injustice" and let's not forget they reblog/retweet and circulate videos that are the basis of such crying, causes and social media frenzy.

For all this awareness you'd think they'd become amazingly educated in the truest sense of the word. They are not. You'd think these "re-define what it means to be a man" types are like Spartans who reads philosophy, at the same time raises two kids and pleases his wife beyond belief in the bedroom. No. They most likely aren't Spartans, most likely they are not married and they probably don't want any kids till their in their mid 30s. They probably have no redeemable skills if a zombie apocalypse happens besides the ability to edit a video for youtube. Great. That comforts me. They probably don't know to handle a gun, or at least have no interest.

As for the women? You wo-MEN see birth and being a mother like it'll ruin your already not really-admirable-life. I could care less if you specialize in Chaucer. Do you know how to cook a badass meal? Can you handle a gun if the man holding it originally gets bitten by a zombie? Probably not because the modern world and your upbringing -- I feel mightily sorry for you if you grew up in NE America, LA, Berkeley or some swamp that is liberal America -- has rendered you practically useless unless it's in the confines of certain industries (entertainment, journalism, fashion and, uh, entertainment, journalism and fashion) and specific cities.