Today I learned that if you only have one sexual partner in your lifetime, or if you view sex is solely for marriage, you're a "hyper-Puritan."

 From the horse's mouth: A Swede. 

But here's my take:

Neurological Differences in Males, Females and Sexualities.

Here's a relatively short post.

Why do we say "Love is Love" and that there are no differences between males and females in terms of athletic performances yet, supposedly, science is showing that there are neurological differences between the following -

• male and females
• homosexuals having neurological frameworks of their opposite sex (hence why they're attracted to their own sex)
• transgender having neurological framework similar to that of the sex they want to transition in (hence their feeling of being in "the wrong body" aka Gender Identity Disorder/Dysphoria)

So when shallow platitudes of "Love is Love" is bandied around, or when commercials showing a huge "x-ray" where people kiss behind it, where the audience only sees the skeletal frame of the two people kissing or hugging, to be met with different races, religions and two people of the same sex once they step in front, you should probably think twice. 

As I said, given the neurological differences, the promotion of sodomy and transgenderism should be questioned. A same-sex pairing isn't going to be worried about committing sodomy and getting pregnant. A transgender has a ton of stuff to work out. Simply put, second and third points to a disorder. Wires crossed or misaligned. We go skin deep to skeletal to microscopic. When people say there's no difference between female and male brain, think again. 

Should we as a society believe women who say they experienced sexual assault or rape?

 Well should we, just on face value?

My answer is be skeptical. If non-believers say that their non-belief is due to there being no evidence of a divine, then adjust your stance when accusations of sexual assault is brought forth. Say that in each case of an accusation of sexual assault is just that - an accusation  - that has yet to be proven and due to this is devoid of direct evidence. The accused is innocent until proven guilty. 

The same goes for sexism, racism, xenophobia and LGBT+phobia.

The LGBT+ narrative isn't sound.

So those with same-sex attraction, either exclusively or attracted to both sexes, are "born that way" -  but transgenders' bodies are wrong.

Ah shit. Just ignore it.

Where does whole "body positivity" come in? There's this whole "love the skin you're in" mentality directed towards chubby and fat people, so why can't this be directed towards transgenders to just "love the skin you're in"?

Dating preferences in Weimerica.

I've notice something strange when it comes to modern dating and the process of choosing a significant other. Here's what I've observed.

A: Love knows no boundaries* (mainly talking about same-sex coupes and interracial couples).
B: Okay, well what about when a person says he is attracted to a certain ethnicity, say Hispanics over an Asian?
A: That's their preference.
B: Okay, well how about a person who wants to keep their ethnicity/culture intact and only wants to date within their own race?
A: That's approaching racism.
B: Can't it be preference?
A: No, because what I'm talking about is sexual and romantic attraction. A utilitarianism approach is racism. The heart wants what it wants.
B: Okay, what if I say a girl won't date a guy shorter than she is, say all the guys under 5'8 are basically out of luck.
A: Another preference.
B: Wouldn't it be a very shallow preference and borderline petty? If people are encourage to date outside their own ethnicity and culture, when can't women be encouraged to re-analyze their preferences?
A: You're committing sexism. Your utilitarian approach is discrimination.
B: What ethnicity preference and height preference is also discrimination.
A: I wouldn't say that. It's a preference. It's not systemic.
B: Okay, let's move away from dating preferences. How about ACT/SAT scores? You need a certain test score and GPA to not automatically be rejected by certain schools and programs. Why isn't there a whole movement about this? This would be considered systemic discrimination.
A: In some ways that's different as well. But see here - underprivileged kids, those who are/were historically marginalized and oppressed, should not subjected to such measurements. It's unfair.

So I guess not everyone and each scenario is not created equal.

* It has come to a point where the social sciences, and even "science", has encouraged straights to dabble in bisexuality aka sodomy.

The patheticness of red pillers.

"Given my understanding of female nature, I sometimes wish I was gay. Heterosexuality on the part of men is somewhat akin to biologically enforced slavery."

I get the feeling that the poster doesn't know what enforced slavery actually is. I also get the feeling that he has little luck with women or that he's incapable of being in a long term relationship.

This is the first time I heard someone entertain the idea of committing sodomy acts for the sake not being "tied" to the opposite sex. Who in their right mind would ever want that?

The insany hypocrisy of the pious modernists.

I think what Trump said 11 years ago on a Hollywood lot was disgusting. It's "guy talk" but nonetheless it was disgusting. I won't defend him and say that this is what men do when alone shooting the breeze therefore it's A-OKAY. It's not. But I will say that those who are offended and are on the left, saying he's a bastard and a sexist, are showing their selective bias and short-term memory.

Many Probably everyone in the entertainment industry loathes Trump. Europe hates him. Yet they love Roman Polanski and they consider it a career milestone to sign up for a Woody Allen film. Now, if you're an actor, or a producer, or director and you think he's a crude man then I'd agree. If you think he's so low, lower than what happens on set and what happens in front of the camera for the name of "art" then you're a hypocrite. The film & television sector makes Broadway appear tame.

If you're a social prog and you think Trump is disgusting just remember that you're all for carpet munching and anal sex all while flying the rainbow flag of death and stagnation. Because wuv and "we're just humans falling in wuv." You're the one who says "Aw!" when two people of the same-sex enter a relationship.

You mock the so-called prudes for their supposed backwards view on sex and sexuality yet when you hear Trump's words you become nice and neat. You gently dab your napkin on the side of your mouth to remove any excess food as you use your indoor voices, talking about equality and empowerment while eating vegan dishes and drinking kale smoothies.

Yes, Trump's past reveals a man of extreme narcissism. But the left is all about narcissism while appealing to the "greater good." Save the whales. Save the global warming refugees. Save the starving kids in Africa. They should love Trump. But he actually appreciates America. So in his case it's "save America" but that's the wrong type of agenda. He's white. That's the wrong type of skin color. He got mega mega rich with business. The Left doesn't like business unless the business gives them money. Trump is running as a Republican - The Left's selective bias and short memory makes them froth at the mouth when the "r" would is mentioned.

If one is intellectually honest Trump should be somewhat liked by The Left, but he isn't. His agendas are wrong. He's a white man. He's a person who seems to genuinely like America. The left can't have that.