New links.

New links added.

Reddit's sub-forum TumblrInAction.

Showing the stupidity of SJWs, feminazis, leftists (modern day liberals) and the tears of fragile psyches.

A big "Thanks!" to Michelle Malkin, who describes herself as "little brown woman with a big mouth," on her twitter profile for Twitchy.

Twitchy stops the "he-said-she-said" telephone game when it comes to all things politics, and aids any wannabe journalist (and real ones) for the actually proof of "He really said this. Here's the proof." It captures tweets and twitter conversations before they are deleted for quality control, and it exposes the bias and contempt of non-conservatives. Free speech is amazing. The late-Andrew Breitbart would be proud.

Welcome to tumblr. The Land of Freaks and ... More Freaks.

Let's presume this person is a woman aka has a real vagina and breasts, no matter how flat chested. She's a lesbian who has no sexual drive, hence the "asexual" description. I'll also presume she's "white" because she doesn't mention anything about race, just what sex she romantically likes and that her libido is practically dead. Gender? Well, if the questions marks are suppose to say, "What's gender? A social construct?" or "I don't subscribe to any," but whatever it meant it's pretty much par for the course with this type of being. Given the "INTF" from the Myers-Briggs personality test, and her interests she's the vagina version of a pasty pimple face, totally-sucks-at-sports, gamer.

I suppose this is a good thing. Her ilk is basically given the middle finger by Darwin. "Sorry, bitch, but you're practically useless unless you build shit and/or manage a company. Your ovaries are a waste."

I have a tumblr (see: sidebar). If I were to follow this sexual identity politics as user "Ode to Abigail" did, I'd write this.

• he/him is fine
• likes ladies
• libido is working properly aka I dream of what my future wife's children will look like once we consummate our relationship
• gender??? I'm a guy. I don't cross-dress. I'm not limp wristed.
• i talk when i need to, move when i need to, achieve what I need to achieve in order to be awesome

Because Tumblr says so!

I typed in "tumblr" in google in order access my page so I could update it for Memorial Day, and the headline link for the site was this. Now all the twits will probably use this in their Phd dissertation concerning sexism.

Yes, I took the bait.

American Sniper over Selma @ BO: Tumblr, IMDb pissed.

BO: Box Office

Tumblr's SJW object to Sleepy Hollow

SPOILERS

There is underlying racism at work according to some posters on tumblr.

IMDb poser MonaRich sensed something wasn't right (them spider senses are tingling!), but thanks to tumblr she was able to make sense of this warning -

Killing off/undermining/sidelining all the POC and then having actual dialogue in the show about how the four white trees will turn black and that means they're extra evil and having Moloch rip off his white skin to reveal the scary evil black thing underneath after he had masqueraded as a pure blonde innocent Aryan prince. Like this *beep* isn't even subtle. It's about as subtle as Birth of a Nation. These new writers are trash.

HarveyMidnight pitches in -

A lot of people felt that it was -- what can we say, somewhat ignorant? -- for the season 2 writers to shove Irving onto the sidelines, push Crane further forward as a 'main character' making Abbie somewhat of a sidekick instead of a balanced equal to him, and outright replace Jenny with a white man who has almost exactly the same skill-set.

Considering Crane and Abbie are the two "witnesses" and not Irving, putting Irving as a secondary character is absolutely understandable. Even in the start of the show I knew Irving wasn't a 'main character' - though one of the 'main' secondary characters. As the season went on Irving still played a vital role; he was written rather effectively and it's nice role for any actor to take on - one filled with many complexes, emotions and trials.

I do not know what show they watched, honestly, but if I'd take a guess I'd guess out of all the episodes Abbie is more of the leader in the adventures than Crane. Maybe because the two actors playing the respective roles differ in height substantially some may come to the conclusion that Abbie is the side-kick.

If we talk about portrayals, Abbie, not only being beautiful, is shown to be amazingly resilient, self-sufficient, smart and resourceful; she is Crane's guide to the modern world and sometimes acts as a bigger sister to him. Crane, when he's met with a modern phrase or piece of technology that bemuses him, is written as the comic relief in a very endearing/charming way. Abbie is practically the rock in their relationship - she may not be flashy or as endearing as her male friend, but it is more of her show than Crane's, so far.

What makes this "Abbie is getting the shaft" issue more interesting is that posters are complaining that Abbie doesn't have a love interest. Yep. Before having a love interest for our heroes would've been deemed sexist in a couple of scenarios: If it was a 'typical' relationship with some 'hot' guy or if the relationship showed the woman in a more passive light than She-Male. I thought being a strong, independent woman who doesn't need a love interest to be happy was of grave importance to show young females across the globe that they too can be She-Males? Whoops.

There's more (Akeda is the name of an episode in S.2) -

I have so many complaints about Akeda. But this is the one that hurt the most and forgive me because this is heavy and I might not be the best person to voice this, but I gotta get off my chest cause last night it had me close to tears.

Media doesn’t exist in vacuum. So what does it say when a show’s only black male lead is sidelined for the majority of the season only to be cut down after twenty minutes of focus? What does it say when the white male lead, then turns around and offers his killer a “life of his choosing” rather than insisting he be brought to any measure of justice due to some clannish misguided notion of loyalty/empathy to his own kind when it is clearly unearned?

Goffman said that they chose to kill Frank because they wanted to make the war feel real. Well thats awesome, congrats, it feels real. Too bad the Cranes didn’t get the memo. Too bad the writer’s didn’t either.

The timing is so *beep* up for this. This was beyond insensitive. This hurt.
Because Crane is suppose to be a Hero. And Frank, goddamnit - Frank mattered. Frank was a friend. His life, his family, his sacrifice all mattered.

Except it didn’t and his one champion was literally injured, tied up, and effectively silenced so the Cranes’ ‘oh so interesting’ unconditional love for their murdering white son could take center stage. And as of right now, the narrative has rewarded them for that and that is really really gross. This show is gross, the writers are gross, the ‘hero’ is gross and I don’t see any indication that that is going to change though I really hope I’m wrong.

Italics: You're making me laugh, seriously. I'll say this: Quit your bitching you little bitch. I was more upset that J.K. Rowling said Ron and Hermione was more of an accident and thought of divorce for them (did she follow through?).

Note: It doesn't help that it seems that many of the fans of Sleepy Hollow fall under the SJW/OmurGurd/My-Feelings-It's-All-About-Emotions group. Like I said in previous posts, I wish my interests and hobbies were different. But they are not.

Dear dear tumblr

I personally get a laugh on how the media - SI, some guy reporting for SI and John Stewart - try to spin the victim hood card with Michael Sam. Just look here. Apparently the poster is a self-proclaimed feminist. Go figure. (Note the "fist pump" a poster gave as a sign of embrace and agreement.)

There's more madness ... and more laughter. A supposed Canadian take down towards those who voted for the GOP instead of the DNC this past November election has been circulating amongst those under 30 with a tumblr account, all with a Dwayne Johnson gif, even though in real life Johnson probably wouldn't agree with the fools.

I laugh for many reasons. 20% to mock, 30% out of disgust and 50% of the reason I I laugh is because it's just plain funny how stupid & naive "open minded" people are.These are the people who consider themselves fighters of the oppressed, the downtrodden and the weak. These are the people called Social Justice Warriors.

The site that hosted the article about the Canadian disappointment of the November election is called American Against the Tea Party. Within their "about us" section this is what is written:

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith

as well as this as the site's mission -

The hatred, division, virulent, unpredictable anger, violent threats and posturing by the Tea-Baggers present a real danger to the lives of President Obama, his family, his administration, Congressional Democrats and liberals and  progressives of all stripes.  Americans Against The Tea Party is a group committed to exposing the Tea Party’s lies, violence, racism, ignorance, intolerance, bigotry, and corporatist-fascist efforts to subvert our democratic process – and organizing together to defeat Tea Party/GOP candidates on the ballot everywhere.   We support the Occupy movement.   WE ARE THE 99%.  WE ARE AATTP!

Cliche after cliche after cliche.

Poster James Richy seems to agree with the writer of the site and Richard Brunt -

I am sure America can look to Canada for political inspiration of what not to do.

The Online Community. Oh dear.

Go to:

reddit (the atheist section, mainly)
IMDb (the forums - mainly the Awards forum and any actor who is popular)
youtube (the comment section)
tumblr (for the Social Justice Warriors & "Progressives")

Sites chock full of modernity. Relativism galore. Subjectivity around every corner. Amorality flowing like black gold.

tumblr "progressive logic"

Rated: "PG-13" for crude language.

Here's a somewhat humorous post:
Not supporting gay "marriage" is equal to being homophobic. Uh huh. Yep.

                                                    "People Are Gay. Get Over It. "

Thanks kid with red hair. You are so insightful. And some people don't support same-sex marriage, even if it becomes law. Get Over It.

Okay, okay. I'll play fair. Yes, people are homosexuals and I doubt, at least my experience, people avoid them due their sexuality.

I'm trying to refrain from using the word 'gay' since gay, originally, meant happy/joyous -- not sure what's so beautiful and happy about same sex 'pairings'  - I also refuse to call same-sex 'couples', well couples. That's reserved for heterosexual relationships. They're "Best Friends Forever" without any actually hopes of procreating with one another because an anus and a penis doesn't biologically produce a baby - it's impossible, nor does a vagina and a vagina. Why? Because a vagina does not produce semen which is needed in order to create a baby. A P and a V does (+fertility and no ABC). There is no actual union between homosexuals (male homosexuals attempt at "sexual union" is more garish than females eating carpet -- I'll admit two females "going at each other" is really "What's the point?").

I know all this is in support for same-sex marriage (anti-bullying is just a convenient smoke & mirrors for the true goal) and that when the judge accepts it as law that's where the "get over it" derives from. Same-sex "marriage" supports will gloat (I've experience first hand) when a law is struck in their favor.

I'll quote some of the responses (it's basically every scenario one think of) -

As a bisexual, it sickens me that some people WILL keep scrolling.

I always say I'm amused - simply because I am. It's rather amusing to me that some people not supporting same-sex "marriage" actually sickens people. So a bisexual is driven to sickness because, if she wants, can't get "married" so her own sex. I won't support such a law for your own "happiness." Please, Get Over It.

As the straight daughter of a gay man, it sickens me that some people will keep scrolling. 

 Okay, and? Not sure if her dad face any discrimination (besides not being able to marry his own sex)?

As a straight girl with a basic understanding of equality and love, it also sickens me that people will keep scrolling.

"A basic understand of equality and love." Oh boy. Where to begin with this one ... A basic understanding of equality is that there really isn't any true equality. Equality - when reality comes into play - is a farce. Sure the homosexual (or bi) man or woman can get married, but to a person of the opposite sex. Two brothers can't get married even if there's consent and both are over 18. In fact, if expansion of "M+F" to "M+M' and "F+F" why limit it to a two party? Why not expand it to three or four? Why not do away with prohibition towards sibling marriages and open it up to Party A, B, C, etc. regardless of sex and blood-line? Why not? I mean, if people objected to such a radical move then they're bigots acting as a road block to the involved parties' happiness - that's according to progressive logic. 

Basic understanding of love? You mean "I have strong feelings for this other person regardless of their sex"? Here are my feelings: I have a strong feeling that the explanation of this "basic understanding of love" will be a bunch of "equality and happiness" rhetoric. I'll probably send her a message and ask. 

As a straight Christian woman, I pray that people will not scroll past this. Love, not judge.

I’m re-reblogging for that last one.

Whoa Now! Not only do we have a person who's straight, but she's also a Christian! Jackpot! Those mean and close minded Christians are so horrid that it's refreshing to see a self-proclaimed Christian preach about Love! Since a straight Christian (with some Kumbaya understanding of love and who, no, doubt, fell for the "Thou Shall Not Judge" - on anything, unless one does not supports SS"M") it's an epic "win"!

Through all this "loving" and not judging SS"M" is passed. That's the goal. That's one of the goals. Not only does the Gay Mafia (as I would like to call them - actually activists and these tumblr rank-and-file types) want society to approve of their relationship but they also want minds to be changed about sexual compatibility. It's not enough for them to get SS"M" approved in every state. Nope. They want there sexual relationships to be seen as completely normal, even though *normal "was" the dreaded state for such advocates.

Well I scrolled. I don't want some horrid social cause looking like a zit on my otherwise nice looking tumblr page. Let alone I'll look like some Millennial without a clue.

*normal: or normalcy - will be a future post.