Sexual Morality is Non-Existent to Modernists/Libertines

Modernists don't think things through, do they? Saying a "woman can do whatever she wants and sleep with whoever" and casting it as "A-OKAY" is a saying "No big deal." That's an indirect way of approving it, which is a judgment call.

I can think of a few big way it affects me: Sex is seen as trivial yet not at the same time which then creates confusion between the two parties (or more) that engage in casual sex. This is basically having ones cake and eating it too. If the "no big deal" attitude is seen as fine then sleeping around isn't looked at anything morally degrading or perverted. Sleeping is then seen as "normal" and anyone who raises an eyebrow is seen as judgmental, sexist or a prude - or all three.

There's a dissonance and I'm not sure why there is one.

It is not necessarily that a woman has slept with ten guys that it concerns me the most - for all I know she could be desperate for money needed to pay off a debt or pay for her child's schooling, or maybe she's just a slut (the only "good" slut in my mind is the one that finds herself in dire situations as noted above) - but the attitude that follows directly after it, "it doesn't affect me" attitude, just makes the whole scenario a pool of feces. The "it doesn't affect you" is probably held by the slut who does sleep with ten  men; oddly enough when the "slept with ten men" story is brought up it will most likely be cast aside like a story that no one wants to hear with a "Who cares?" or maybe a "It's non of your business."

But if someone bullied or teased a classmate? It's a big deal. If someone doesn't vote for gay "marriage"? It's a big deal.

What also gets me confused the "every man is an island" when it comes to sex but all of a sudden I have to care about the whales and the trees. It's like personal responsibility and restraint in the modernist/libertine's mind is not really a solid foundation for a sound society, but supporting "green" products, so called "civil rights" and practicing tolerance (the extreme kind of "it doesn't affect you" types) is. Amorality naturally sides with debauchery.

Does this make a moralist? Maybe so. Does this make judgmental? Yes.