The stupidity of The Right (or non-progs) concerning "equality."

 Rated PG-13 for crude language.

This is about conscription of women.

There is a faction within The Right that are cheering on the drafting of women. Why?

"Let the feminists get what they deserve!"

Well, by that reasoning you should also support women in combat roles under "equal opportunity." You should also acknowledge that there are no major differences between a man and woman. You should also burrow away any tenderness you have towards a woman because they are just human beings - nothing special. Feed 'em to the wolves. In fact, you should stop caring about almost everything.

I know there are some who have been in the military and see this as a good thing. It's equal opportunity in their eyes and they are all for women wanting to serve their country. Of course there's the story of a mother and daughter who wanted to sign up for the selective service. First, this mother and daughter are egotistical assholes. If the daughter truly wanted to serve she should've joined the military straight out of high school or join ROTC in college. Second, who the fuck is pissed that they can't join the selective service? Is this for real? And to those who have served or are currently serving who support such a thing: you're dabbling in the moronic corner. The dunce hat is a few feet away from you. It's white and shaped like a cone. It says "DUNCE" on it.

There are those that act like women are being held back from serving their country; they aren't. They can serve in any branch and in any component. Before December 2015, all of the jobs were open to women save for infantry and SFs. There was no long petition from women wanting to tryout for the Rangers, SEALs, PJs or the Green Berets. As always, there will be those in active duty who support women in combat roles saying things like "It's not about ones sex or gender. It's about their willingness to serve and their character." You're right. And I bet you also support the laughable reality that is same-sex "marriage." There are idiot servicemen, so beware of them when asking about "equality" since they too are not immune to stupidity. They will then tell a story of a some rare female unicorn that can take on a 6'3 11B. Sure. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

What we have are people who The Left crave for: idiots. They need people who don't think things through to in order prevail. 

Personally, the thought of knowing that women are going to be conscripted is sickening. It's true, I view women differently than men. Men fought in the lines of WWII and the survivors of that war said they would never want others to experience what they did. Yet if WWIII breaks out, or if a woman in the combat role is deployed, such a wish is shattered. It's one thing to let men go off to war and fight in the front-lines, getting ripped about by shrapnel and bullets. It's another thing to out women in that exact same position.

Fools who support drafting women will say, "What if there's a Red Dawn?" So now you treat that prospect with respect? People mocked those who stood up for the 2nd Amendment. "Look there's not gonna be a Red Dawn you fools ... You don't all those guns." Now, when met with "woman power" the Red Dawn scenario is taken seriously. Fuck you. Even if there was a Red Dawn that's what our volunteer military is far. 1% of the population, those of age, are in the military, be it active or part-time. Now all of a sudden serving in the military is real fucking important. (Sorta like how marriage was all of a sudden important when same-sex "marriage" was being pushed.) That's what the National Guard is for. That's what the 2nd Amendment is far (but the leftists wants that taken away).

This isn't me thinking women are helpless, fragile beings.  This is me thinking women are innately different than men, both emotionally, mentally and physically, and that seeing a woman ripped apart by an RPG is a rather sickening reality. War is already sickening, why make it more so? Some will say, "Are boys lives less valuable to the nation?" Yes and no. Males were meant for war, if need be. Conscription was mainly to fill combat roles. You will have the idiots who try to say, "Well they can make a clause saying that women can be exemplified from combat roles." Bullshit. That's you wanting to have your cake and eat it too.

Infantry is special - that's where most of the Medal of Honor are given, mainly for the direct reality facing the opposition. Infantry is "the classic" MOS branch. Without it the military wouldn't be "the military." That's where Dick Winters gained his legendary status alongside E Company. That's where Captain William Swenson showed his compassion for his fellow wounded soldier. I sense that the hard-line feminists and the fools want in on this as well. They want to see the a female infantry Medal of Honor recipient.

Women, as the late General Robert H. Barrow said, give life, not take it (unless you count abortion). I am not willing to dismiss tradition and the status quo for this type of "progress." It's not progress. It's devolution. A nation who conscripts there females is a nation who has lost their moral compass, the true north, for "equality." Equality, like diversity, is utter bullshit when practiced the modern way.

I can go all conspiracy and say that it was all planned, that shrinking the military and slowly eroding the 2nd Amendment was to allow women into combat roles and to justify the drafting of women. If the citizens of the US don't have guns and are helpless to defend themselves then send in Wonder Woman! See, the allowing of women into combat roles works! See, conscripting women works - now we have enough military personnel AND these women are "being all they can be"!

Back to reality.

As Jude Eden points out there are military careerists who want the promotion, who want to be known as "that person who helped usher in 'progress.'" There are generals who deny that it's about quotas and political correctness, but about access - to build a future that was once denied (sound familiar? See: Chief Justice Anthony's Obergefell v Hodges approval), forgetting that their bases of "access" is political correctness.

When foolish men run the country (Obama, Chief Justice Anthony) you get a shitty society. When you have foolish men who are in charge of the military (Carter, Mabus, Neller) you help destroy the greatest military force on the planet. And all under the guise of "progress" and (not "equality") but "equal opportunity." There's a slight change in words, but the shift is important because it frames a demographic that's propped up as a victim and if we allowed such changes we'd be a better nation for it. Or they say.

Ashton Carter's order to allow women in combat roles under "equal opportunity" will be a decision that will be bemoaned (silently by those with a sane mind) in future decades. General Neller's call to open the draft to women will be looked upon as a careerist move. It has nothing to do with making the nation's military force stronger or more efficient. If WWII did not need women on the front-lines let alone conscripted why now? There is no need. There are only needs that are fabricated.

Equality, the usage of it in the modern sense, must be relegated to dustbins of history, only to be acknowledged of what not to do.